Comparison

What the harness adds
around a scanner.

A scanner reports what it saw. BountyHarness adds scope, planning, safety gates, impact verification, and the evidence needed for another person to reproduce the result.

BountyHarnessSingle-purpose scannerAd-hoc scripts
Bug classes46 skills1 (e.g. nuclei)Whatever you wrote last
Evidence standardRequest + response + PoC + impactRaw outputInconsistent
Safety gating4 tiers + scope + circuit breakerNoneManual discipline
Tool management99 tools, capability-mappedBundled templatesManual installs
PlanningDomain-driven ranked planRun everythingGut feel
Knowledge reuseProgram memory, asset graphNoneNotes files
Autonomous modebb-hunt from one URLManual chainingCron + hope
Report qualityImpact-verified, CVSS, platform exportNot a reportCopy-paste

When to use what

Use BountyHarness when

You want a repeatable, evidence backed workflow across many bug classes, especially when an agent is driving.

Use a scanner when

You need fast, broad coverage for a single class (e.g. nuclei for CVE templates). BountyHarness actually wraps nuclei via the nuclei-scanner skill.

Not either/or. BountyHarness orchestrates scanners. It does not replace them. The recon, nuclei-scanner, and cloud skills wrap and scope the same tools you'd run manually, with rate limits and evidence capture built in.